carbon sequestration, definition of

Climate change is a change in the statistical distribution of weather over periods of time that range from decades to millions of years. It can be a change in the average weather or a change in the distribution of weather events around an average (for example, greater or fewer extreme weather events). Climate change may be limited to a specific region, or may occur across the whole Earth.

In recent usage, especially in the context of environmental policy, climate change usually refers to changes in modern climate. It may be qualified as anthropogenic climate change, more generally known as global warming.

Wikipedia - Climate Change entry

• Carbon Capture: Tech Giants Throw Money at the Latest Green Trend
  As tech giants race to outdo each other in the climate virtue-signaling game, the public would do well to remember that these projects often serve corporate interests far more effectively than they serve the planet...
• A Bit Of Perspective Goes A Long Way
  I mean, if we could build one of these suckers per week, that would only take us … hang on, let's see … carry over what sums to greater than 9, divide by pi, take the square root, allow for Cook's Factor, this math stuff is tough … that would only...
• Earthquakes, Leakage, Expense, Death by Asphyxiation – Is There No Beginning to the Advantages of Carbon Capture?
  DeSmog is all in on the invented climate crisis and a fervent supporter of the political Net Zero fantasy. It obviously hates all hydrocarbon use and has reported on the problems of carbon capture. For its part, mainstream media just sticks with demonising...
• Civil War Breaks Out in the Green Blob But Don’t Expect the BBC to Report it
  The hatred arises because carbon capture is seen as legitimising the continued use of hydrocarbons. The less insane greens are finally realising that they cannot ban hydrocarbons altogether. This is due to the fact that half the world’s population would...
• Govt To Waste £22bn On Unproven Carbon Capture
  What is certain though is that producing electricity using carbon capture is more expensive than not using carbon capture, not least because the process itself wastes a lot of energy...
• AEP’s Carbon Capture Fantasy
  The idiot is back again
• How the failure of carbon capture risks causing a net zero nightmare
  Meanwhile Miliband’s plans to rely on carbon capture are in ruins
• The Carbon Capture Con
  The only certain outcome from CCUS is more expensive electricity and a waste of energy resources to do all the separation, compressing and pumping.
• The Cost of EPA’s Senseless CO2 Capture
  Finally, besides being expensive and futile, keep in mind: Plants need CO2, along with sunlight, water, and nutrients from the soil to produce oxygen and food, both of which are essential for all living beings.
• Green Blob Tells Government to Spend £30 Billion on Machine to Remove CO2 From the Air
  In other words, the green agenda has produced a useless machine whose only function is to produce designs for useless machines.

Related Tags: carbon cycle