The Original Eco Friendly & Sustainable Living Portal (since 2009)
santer, Tag
- Watch the Pea – AR5 Chapter 10 Wed, 14 Dec 11, 6:34amAs CA readers are aware, key findings of Santer et al 2008 do not hold using updated data. Ross and I submitted a comment to IJC showing this. The comment was rejected twice, with one of the reviewers (as in the case of the...
- Using Santer’s Method Fri, 13 Aug 10, 10:36pmUsing Santer’s own methodology with up-to-date observations, here are results comparing observations to the ensemble mean of Chad’s collation of 57 A1B to models to 2009...
- A Mixed Effects Perspective on MMH10 Thu, 12 Aug 10, 2:19pmToday’s post is complementary to MMH10, which, as readers obviously realize, is in Ross’ excellent style. There has been a kneejerk reaction from climate scientists that the article is “wrong” –...
- Conflicted Reviewers Distort Literature Tue, 10 Aug 10, 11:48pmThe comments by James Annan and his reviewers here on McKitrick et al (2010) demonstrate very nicely how the literature gets distorted by the rejection of a simple comment showing that the application of Santer’s own...
- McKitrick et al (2010) accepted by Atmos Sci Lett Mon, 9 Aug 10, 11:18pmCA readers are aware that Ross and I twice submitted a comment on Santer et al 2008 to International Journal of Climatology (both available on arxiv.org), showing that key Santer results (which were based on data only up...
- FOI Myth #1: USA Tue, 29 Dec 09, 2:30pmClimate scientists have recently been promoting the myth that providing data in response to FOI requests was interfering with their work. Nature uncritically accepted this myth in a recent editorial calling for action to...