steyn, Tag

The “hockey stick” graph as published in IPCC TAR (Figure 2-20, 2001) By Jo Nova Climate deniers must be punished For newcomers: Michael Mann’s hockeystick graph was wildly different from hundreds of studies of...

SM: This article by JD Ohio was submitted and briefly online on February 23, 2018, but, for some reason that I don’t recall, was taken offline. In any event, as Mann’s ancient libel case wends its way into a DC...

By Jo Nova Watch the whole segment on SteynOnline or ADH TV in Australia, and more coming soon. Watch at SteynOnline or ADH TV in Australia A wonderful chance to discuss some of the heavier aspects of EV cars, more dangerous...

Watch on SteynOnline or ADH TV By Jo Nova My appearance with the wonderful Mark Steyn Tuesday is playing at SteynOnline, or on the Australian ADH TV. Mark was tickled with the idea from my article last week: The science is...

Mark Steyn to Tucker Carlson: They’re blathering, people from the Vice President on down, saying these riots are not “who we are”. Have you switched on a TV since Memorial Day? This is exactly who we are.

Michael Mann has lost a motion in the DC Superior Court. He will now be responsible for the majority of legal costs for discovery in his perpetual libel suits against Steyn and the National Review.

The process is the punishment. Agents of the Big-government Blob have access to a bottomless pit of lawyers. They can not only afford endless trials, for them it’s an advantage. Drag it out, wear opponents down, exhaust...

The Mark Steyn 2016 Tour of Australia kicks off this weekend.

.. The unstoppable Mark Steyn has collected illuminating quotes from Michael Mann’s peers about the value of the Hockey Stick and Mann’s work.  Steyn has both announced the book, and taken apart the critics like...

In today’s post, I’ll show that even Andrew Weaver was tricked by Mann’s IPCC 2001 hide-the-decline. Weaver’s incorrect belief that the IPCC diagram showed “four” “independent”...

One of the most bizarre conclusions of D.C. Judge Combs-Greene were her findings that it was actionable to  “question [Mann’s] intellect and reasoning” and that calling his work “intellectually bogus”...

In some recent posts, I’ve observed that Carvin made a couple of astonishing gaffes in his oral argument.  In today’s post, I’ll comment on the worst one.  First, I’ll report the exchange without...

Towards the end of Carvin’s mostly cringeworthy rebuttal,  he seemed to score on EPA’s rejection of complaints against Mann’s own defamatory accusations of “scientific fraud”...

I have an audio copy of the oral argument in Mann v Steyn, which I’ve posted up (see link at the end of this post). One of things often under-estimated by those readers (especially at WUWT) who are bloodthirsty for...

About eight weeks ago, Jean S postulated that Gavin Schmidt had been involved in writing the documents supporting EPA’s decision denying various petitions for reconsideration of the Endangerment Finding (the “RTP...