The reason why the “ExxonKnew” lawsuits haven’t collapsed yet is because nobody of major political influence has torpedoed the false claims in those cases about industry disinfo campaigns and “crooked skeptic climate...
In what may be a world record for turnaround time, the litigation has already begun over the recent rescission by EPA of its carbon emission standards for fossil-fuel fired power plants.
These are the chain of people one increment back from the main promulgators who’ve pushed the false accusation about ‘shill skeptic scientist on Big Oil’s payroll who were directed to reposition global warming as theory‘...
For years, the left has used the supposed “consensus” on climate science to ram through its agenda unchallenged. That cover is starting to crack.
Trusted institutional gatekeepers like the Federal Judicial Center must institute rigorous vetting mechanisms to restore their credibility. Ultimately, federal and state officials should investigate how ELI and CJP gained...
This chapter on “How science works” is basically a misleading attempt to advance the false claim that there is a consensus supporting climate alarmism...
An under-the-radar legal switcheroo should concern every business leader, investor, and taxpayer in America. Now, 23 state attorneys general have taken notice and sent a letter to the Administrative Office of U.S. Courts...
There are no such words to that effect anywhere in the 131-page Smithsonian FOIA docs. The only thing that resembles a direct communication between Dr Soon and any Exxon official is seen at the bottom of PDF file page 33.
See the way nothing lines up right here? On top of all of that, the accusation itself has no merit. Dr Soon can readily explain how the Smithsonian was in charge of whatever donations he got toward his work, and not a single...
Stricter enforcement of the FARA law and its transparency requirements could also act as a deterrent against green pressure groups in league with China and other hostile foreign actors...
They didn't actually say "USA", but we all know what they meant.
Apply enough pressure on those far bigger luminary names, and they may choose to roll on who it was who provided them with that worthless accusation material.
“The Affordable Insurance and Recovery Act (SB 982) would impose liability on fossil fuel companies for ‘climate-attributable damages,’ expected to be assessed in billions of dollars...
Lawsuit seeks to compel NOAA to act on a year-old petition to designate the whale’s migration path a “critical habitat” to ensure its survival.
The legacy new media reporters never once questioned the collective accusation sources behind the “crooked skeptic climate scientists” accusation. This rock-bottom journalism malfeasance problem is unsustainable. The...
- Popular Related Tags: climate lawsuits, epa, opinion, climate politics, exxon knew, endangerment finding, biden administration, scotus, intermittent wind and solar, gao
- Search for "climate lawsuits" on our Eco Web Search