The bottom line is this: blocking the sun to cool the planet is an inherently dangerous idea. Sunlight is the basis of life on Earth. Corrupting its distribution and intensity will not stabilize climate but destabilize societies....
The NYT narrative is that corals are incapable of surviving the modest warming projected this century. But both history and peer-reviewed science show otherwise
In short, the movement has reached the fifth stage of grief. Acceptance. Not acceptance that the planet is doomed, but acceptance that climate politics as conceived in Paris is finished. The NYT admits as much without ever...
In the end, “Weepy Bill” is less a revolutionary than a relic. His Sun Day will come and go, leaving behind a few doodles of yellow circles, some speeches no one remembers, and the faint sound of melting ice cream dripping...
The NYT must always remember that the purpose of corrections is to inform the reader of what is actually true, rather than to protect its writers from embarrassment or protect preferred narratives that cannot withstand scrutiny.
Yesterday, the New York Times ran a story that was blatantly false, with the Seattle Times featuring it as well.
This isn't cutting-edge climate tech. It’s an energy-intensive Rube Goldberg machine designed to appease green investors, virtue-signaling corporations, and bureaucrats allergic to basic physics.
The types of wildfires Minnesota has recently experienced are not unprecedented and state weather data does not support the claim that climate change has had anything to do with them...
Bottom line: the Times can scream all it wants, but the world is moving on. From my point of view, it can’t happen too fast.
This article shows that the NYT continues to be wedded to promoting pseudoscientific climate alarmism. Rather than investigating the real causes complicating and limiting blood donation and delivery, ranging from donor apathy...
It seems the NYT story is built on a fact-free “House of Cards,” emblematic of the mainstream media increasing tendency to write “Fake News,” and ignore facts, especially when the issue is climate change.
So here we are: a tale of a Hawaiian office facing the axe, spun into a dirge for “climate science”—that noble pursuit some might call taxpayer-funded navel-gazing...
The solar hype continued last month in the pages of the New York Times with an article by David Wallace-Wells headlined, “What Will We Do With Our Free Power?” The nut graf of Wallace-Wells’ article appeared near the...
Apparently, NYT reporter Coral Davenport couldn’t be troubled to seek out the facts. Or perhaps, she just doesn’t know how. This sort of slapdash reporting containing speculative claims rather than simple facts seems...
To be clear, in recent decades, the GBR’s extent was lower, much lower, than at present when ocean temperatures were cooler, and it has grown considerably in the aftermath of bleaching events.
- Popular Related Tags: new york times, climate change, andrew revkin, alarmism, global warming, bad science journalism, james hansen, media, environment, politics
- Search for "new york times" on our Eco Web Search