If it weren’t for bad luck, I’d have no luck at all.
As should be obvious to any honest observer exercising the least bit of common sense, the reason for rising disaster costs is clear, the expanding bullseye effect.
Each story followed the same template: a small event, inflated into a global narrative. But a closer look at the facts — and the research on Arctic mosquito ecology — suggests a much simpler, less dramatic explanation.
As a news organization, the BBC should not carry water for its government or government advisory boards that want to continue wasting money on futile “objectives to prevent further temperature rise” when direct efforts...
And why do the government now need the advice of a bunch of climate crackpots to tell them how to adapt to weather? They managed perfectly alright before Gummer and his little band of con-merchants came along.
But we might need a few extra tenths of a degree global warming to see the effects.
And you thought alarmists had reached the limits of absurdity...
University of East Anglia academics: "We surveyed British MPs – most don’t know how urgent climate action is"
Time author Justin Worland is distressed that companies don't understand alarmist predictions of future climate harms.
Excepting those Amazon trees which were bulldozed for the COP30 climate conference of course.
Fungal Fiction mimicking fiction?
Fear of climate change, regardless of how ill-founded, is having a traumatic impact on millions of people.
The Aussie ABC thinks Zoomers are staging a baby strike until their elders fix the climate crisis.
What was the opportunity cost of producing yet another "beyond doubt" climate report?
Apparently it's not the broken meteorological models, climate climate is making the world more unpredictable.
- Popular Related Tags: alarmism, opinion, climate change, global warming, ridiculae, bad science journalism, its worse than we thought, sea level, agriculture, climate
- Search for "alarmism" on our Eco Web Search