There are Supreme Court decisions that arrive with fanfare, and then there are those that quietly rearrange the legal landscape in ways that only become obvious after the dust settles...
A decisive ruling to halt this lawfare overreach can’t come soon enough.
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that could end the practice of cities suing energy companies, claiming their businesses harm the public by increasing greenhouse gas emissions and causing global warming...
Let’s hope the Supreme Court agrees that Boulder’s lawsuit is an excellent opportunity to terminate frivolous climate lawfare, expand on the guidance it provided in these two previous cases – and end attempts by climate...
The Court has provided the legal framework. FERC must provide the will to use it.
he fact that the project might foreseeably lead to the construction or increased use of a separate project does not mean the agency must consider that separate project’s environmental effects
The Gulf of America Region (GOAR) manages three programs on the Gulf of America Outer Continental Shelf (OCS): oil and gas, renewable energy and marine minerals...
[Our question] How can updating the Reference Manual to address junk science best be accomplished given such a massive input from entrenched academics in the past?
The Supreme Court may soon decide whether far-left cities or states can circumvent legislative processes and instead use our courts to impose radical environmental agendas.
But overall, my view is that the end of Chevron is good news for those resisting the growth of the government.
The end of Chevron deference is the return to a system of government more aligned with our Constitutional Republic (despite the fact that CNN apparently doesn’t know what that means).
...the court should “recognize that the fundamental problem is Chevron itself.”
Supreme Court should end “Chevron deference” to restore checks, balances and reality
It is incumbent upon the Senate to finally assess Mr. Goffman’s record before re-joining the agency, what he did and did not disclose about that record, and how it is possible he has remained involved in a key item for...
“In sum, we hold that the CWA [Clean Water Act] extends to only those “wetlands with a continuous surface connection to bodies that are ‘waters of the United States’ in their own right,” so that they are “indistinguishable”...
- Popular Related Tags: scotus, climate lawsuits, epa, chevron deference, west virginia v epa, wotus, regulation, politics, endangerment finding, commentary
- Search for "scotus" on our Eco Web Search