sea level, Tag

By Jo Nova Last year, like every other year, was the hottest variation of something.

This report presents and analyses the sea level data for 2025.  It was a roller coaster year for sea level data that turned into a “Hunt the Data” exercise.  As a consequence, the analyses main purpose is to link the...

Energies Media seems to have relied on a lot of very outdated information to make their fearmongering claims about Tokelau. If the media outlet was really interested in the facts rather than pushing climate alarmism, it would...

The true threat to the people of Timor-Leste is not a slightly warmer world or a few millimeters of sea-level rise; it is economic decline from a lack of affordable, reliable energy like that derived from coal, oil, and natural...

The overall conclusion is that the 29-year variation is to do with the work involving the linear fitting but there is a general variation of about 18 years in all the tidal graphs which shows up in the full satellite data.

I analysed the Tidal Gauge results of 9 ports in the northern regions of the Atlantic Ocean and above up to the Arctic Ocean. The analysis was very simplistic but showed promise so now a more detailed analysis will be carried...

This study consists of two parts:- Part 1 – Variation of NOAA Sea Levels  globally and for the 24 sub-areas. Part 2 – Variation of NOAA Sea Level data based on individual satellites.

The narrative is predictable: a single unusual event is simulated, extrapolated, and then turned into a headline-worthy forecast of future doom.

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach Ever wondered how a tiny rise in sea level—let’s say, the aquatic equivalent of topping up your birdbath—might be responsible for frigid winters rampaging through…

Futility quantified, now with NEW and IMPROVED modeling!

Alarmists claim that, due to anthropogenic climate change (AGW), the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is weakening to the point that it’s on the verge of collapsing...

The claim that Tuvalu is “barely one meter above sea level” and faces imminent destruction is a talking point that has been circulating for more than 30 years.

The long-term rise is steady and gradual—not accelerating catastrophically, and less than a third of 3.6-foot projection that Climate Central is lying about.

Reality shows that the simple equation of “rising sea levels = island disappearance” is naive oversimplification. Scientists suggest that some islands will shrink, others will grow, and many will remain stable.

So Greenland has spoken, and its message is simple: the models were wrong. Meltwater refreezes. Runoff is less than claimed. Sea-level rise is not accelerating in the way the prophets declared.