climate propaganda, Tag

Today’s climate lie comes from Climate Brief:

A closer look at the data suggests that rising nighttime temperatures — not dangerous daytime heat — are mostly to blame for the modest increase in “average” temperatures...

Once again, Fiona Harvey, the Guardian’s Environment Editor-cum-resident climate evangelist, has taken to the pages of her paper to deliver a sermon on the supposed settled science of climate change...

Latest hysteria: preparing for heatwave-pandemics… the fake heat crisis… controlling people under the guise of protecting them.

Possibly one of the dumbest and most scientifically illiterate climate scare stories ever written has been published by the fast-fading UK Sky News. Climate reporter Victoria Seabrook notes that the sea ice on the Arctic...

You do not publish any information that you know full well to be wrong, whether or not you add some small print saying “Storm frequencies and intensities are less certain further back in time”. To do so is grossly dishonest...

Taking spring as an example, although the average has increased since the 19thC, that does not mean individual springs are getting wetter. What has changed is that unusually dry springs are now less common.

In reality temperatures in the Arctic have been stable for the last two decade. The Arctic is not “warming” at all.

Ecologist author Tom Hardy has pulled out all the stops, from John Cook's 97% study to accusing the GWPF of having friends like Ian Plimer.

As Climate Realism has repeatedly shown before, here, here, and here, for example, AFP seems wedded to reporting the narrative that humans are causing dangerous climate change, even when the data repeatedly debunks such...

This is the usual “One Day = Climate” hooey we are used to seeing from the Met Office, which appears to think we have not worked out there are 364 other days in the year! In fact a temperature of 29.3C in the London...

While sea levels are rising, PBS exaggerates the rise. There is no evidence that extreme weather is getting worse for Rhode Island. Evidence suggests that population growth and infrastructure problems are mostly to blame...

Ultimately, this article is simply an advocacy piece for specious lawsuits against oil companies with deep financial pockets. Nature should be ashamed of itself for publishing it.

Good riddance. May this be the first of many steps toward reining in the arrogance of central planners who believe they have the right — and the competence — to redesign society based on speculative, unprovable theories.

"...  we assumed that if the climate worsened enough, people would act, but instead, we’re seeing the ‘boiling frog’ effect ..."