propaganda, Tag

Not for the first time, the BBC are using human tragedy to push their increasingly hysterical climate agenda.

Whenever discussing renewables subsidies on the internet, there is a form of Godwin’s Law that means it is inevitable that someone will come along and say: “Ackshually, fossil fuels are subsidised more than renewables,”...

This allegedly scientific study is not about preserving our way of life. But it certainly provides a base from which to launch a barrage of new messaging.

By Jo Nova If anyone made a game shooting lasers at parasitic flying climate believers they would be arrested for hate-speech. But if a government agency promotes a game that dehumanizes, mocks and kills critics of the government...

It is a shameful and obvious demonstration that the NYT cares more about furthering the climate agenda, than they do about reporting the facts.

The only factor pushing up food prices is the consistently high price of oil and gas, the intended result of attempts by western governments to throttle off new drilling...

...there might be some concern that another science-lite campaign could eventually lead to more grovelling public accountability, laughable scorn and diminished credibility.

In summary, Seattle Times ClimateLab articles are not doing anyone a favor by telling tall tales about drought and climate change.  El Nino conditions are evident right now, with low snowpack but near normal precipitation. ...

By Jo Nova It’s lucky the world has so many billionaires to save us from Democracy eh? But instead of persuading us, or doing honest adverts to save the world (which they could obviously afford) they prefer the deceptive...

The article discusses ongoing criticism of BBC's partiality towards climate change issues. According to the writer, this began after a BBC seminar in 2006 where it was decided to prioritize climate consensus in their news...

A clue for Mr Chadwick – snow falls in winter on Greenland, and in summer it melts. If it did not melt, the ice cap would grow every year.

The number of "researchers" that are an embarrassment to humanity continues to swell exponentially.

The bottom line is that the claim that PM2.5 causes death is the most demonstrable science fraud of our time.

Meanwhile back in the real world, real flood experts have analysed historical flood trends, and found that the percentage of the population at risk has actually declined since 1870 in Britain:

The net effect of all this apocalyptic rhetoric, which effectively exploits how humans misperceive risk, is to increase neurotic worrying in many people (particularly children), which can indeed make people more vulnerable...