The Washington Post has taken a modest statistical decline in select minerals and inflated it into a planetary health crisis. That is not balanced reporting. Their readers deserve better.
Credit where it is due. The Washington Post reported on a dangerous storm without turning it into a climate morality play. That is how extreme weather coverage should be done.
Does this mean we will have fewer stories from the Post about how human hair clothing can save the Earth?! What will happen to the team of Washington Post ‘climate solution’ reporters?! The world of journalism has dramatically...
This is just another instance of activist journalism at work that is tailored to fit a bought and paid for climate crisis narrative that is so often being pushed today in the media.
“If you’re wasting cold water to get your hot water, then you’re really wasting both water and the energy resources,”
I guess that's true if you memory hole 1925, 1930s, 1950s, 1980, 1985, 1990, 1995, 2012, 2020, etc. and the rest of the almanac.
The idea of disastrous “tipping points” may make for good headlines and story ledes, but there is no evidence any exist.
WaPo did a shameful job of journalism, misleading their readers into thinking something that simply isn’t true.
From The Daily Caller Michael Bastasch | Energy Editor There’s no evidence the government shutdown is making weather forecasts less accurate, according to experts...
- Popular Related Tags: wapo, bad science journalism, alarmism, washington post, agriculture, july, sanitation, hurricanes, forecasting, single studism
- Search for "wapo" on our Eco Web Search